One page per clause
The guidance in our words, the evidence a reviewer asks for, the common gaps and what to do before the second edition lands.
Open the registerWhat evidence does a resilience review ask for?
The evidence follows the nine attributes: a purpose used in decisions, a context register with owners, defined roles and authority, observed culture behaviours, tested critical knowledge, a core service resource map, discipline handoffs, an improvement loop and an evaluation profile. Each clause page lists the specific artefacts.
Last updated: . Written from the 2017 edition and the ISO record. Not legal advice; does not certify.
Start with purpose and context
The purpose shows whether the resilience work has a direction. The context register shows whether the organization knows what is changing. A reviewer will ask for a decision that used each, not a document that states each.
Then leadership, culture and knowledge
The role and authority map, including deputies, shows whether decisions can move when the usual holder is unavailable. The culture evidence is behavioural: what happened after a concern was raised. The knowledge evidence is whether a new person could make a routine decision from the record.
Then resources and disciplines
The core service resource map, the single point decisions and the acceptable service levels show whether the organization has chosen what to protect. The discipline map and the seam protocols show whether the functions act as a system.
Then improvement and evaluation
The improvement loop needs criteria, a review rhythm and a change log. The evaluation needs a baseline, monitoring and a periodic review with decisions. A reviewer will ask what changed because of the measurement.
Related clauses
- 5.2 Shared vision and clarity of purpose
- 5.4 Effective and empowered leadership
- 5.7 Availability of resources
- 6.4 Reporting
Questions
How many evidence items are there?
The register lists 174 evidence lines across 41 clause and discipline pages. The kit consolidates them into one working file so a team can assign an owner to each.
Do I need all of it for a small organization?
The guidance applies to any size, and the depth can be proportionate. A small organization can still show a purpose, a context view, a resource decision and an evaluation. It can use a lighter method, not a missing one.
Can I use the kit as the evidence?
No. The kit is the register and the plan. The evidence is your record: your purpose, your context, your resource decisions, your evaluation. The kit tells you what to produce and gives you the columns to track it.
Run the free transition check / Open the register / The kit and the watch
THE RULES THIS IS BUILT FROM
Read from the real rules, not invented
Every clause answer on this site points to the official clause behind it, so you can check any line yourself. The register holds 41 records, 174 evidence lines and 123 common failure lines. The revision dates come from the ISO record, one national member body record and one reseller record. The clause substance comes from ISO 22316:2017, the published edition in force.
21 CLAUSE RECORDS
20 DISCIPLINES
Annex A, clearly labelled
Annex A is informative and names twenty management disciplines. Each page says so, because a finding cannot rest on guidance alone.
Open the annexONE STAGE RECORD
No invented date
Stage 50.00 is recorded on 6 July 2026. The planning date is an estimate and is labelled wherever it appears.
Read the recordThe FDIS text is not public and is not reproduced. The clause record covers the 2017 edition. No clause-level change in the FDIS is claimed. Where the public record is silent, the page says so.